<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Education on W3MRB — Ham Radio &amp; 3D Printing</title>
    <link>https://w3mrb.com/tags/education/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Education on W3MRB — Ham Radio &amp; 3D Printing</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2026 Michael Bell (W3MRB).
</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://w3mrb.com/tags/education/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>We&#39;re Teaching Ham Radio Backwards</title>
      <link>https://w3mrb.com/blog/2026/07/teaching-ham-radio-backwards/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://w3mrb.com/blog/2026/07/teaching-ham-radio-backwards/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I passed my General exam the same way a lot of people do: I memorized the answers. Not the concepts, not the <em>why</em> — the answers. Question pool goes in, correct letter comes out, and a few weeks later the FCC mails you a piece of paper that says you understand things you don&rsquo;t.</p>
<p>I&rsquo;m studying for Amateur Extra now, and the memorization strategy has hit a wall. The Extra pool is dense with theory — reactance, Smith charts, filter design, propagation modes — and you can brute-force your way to a passing grade without ever building an intuition for any of it. I could probably still do it. But I&rsquo;d be doing exactly what I did for General, and I&rsquo;d walk away from the test knowing less than the license claims I do.</p>]]></description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>

